Serving Time on Jury Duty

I have a new identity, one for serving slabs o' justice.
One day it shows up unannounced, like an obnoxious person you knew from college that you had hoped you’d never see again.

It’s a summons for jury duty; your civic duty for being a counted by the census.

I had served once before, 15 years ago. Here in Gwinnett County, Georgia, jury duty could be as long as a week. Every night I must call to see if I’m required to show up the next day. In my previous experience, I did. It was one long week and the only trial I heard was a fender bender.

I lobbied hard for the death penalty, to no avail.

So here I was again, 8 A.M. Monday. There were over 250 citizens dutifully processed and filed into the large holding room. The officials got us organized into batches of 12. That organization process took three full hours.

I was juror #17 and had the pleasure of being seated in front of two women who chattered on and on throughout the morning. One woman (juror #47) was loud, the other (juror #48) spoke in whispered tones that I couldn’t really hear. Perhaps a neighborhood dog heard her.

Juror #47 is in her early 60s, with black hair. She wore a white cotton pants suit, a blue blouse, tan flats, a blue canvas hat with flowers and tinted prescription glasses.

Juror #48 is about the same age, taller and stouter in brown polyester slacks, a white top, brown flats and a magnificent doo of bright blond hair. What follows are some of the things I heard coming out of juror #47’s active mouth:

“Timothy Geithner got his job in the Obama administration because because his parents were friends with Barack’s mother.”

“Barack was put into power by George Soros, who is his puppet master.”

Juror #47 (on left) tells secrets at day's end.
“The Democrats don’t want to bring down debt, ever! They just want to tax and hurt small businesses.”

“Soros wants to make the dollar worth ten cents. He wants to topple the U.S. He’s done it to other countries.”

“All this pay to teachers and social security and medicare is a big Ponzi scheme.”

“Glenn Beck predicted the leftist activists would cause troubles in the mideast, and look what happened. Rioting in Greece– something’s going on. The left is sending activists to the middle east. All this trouble going on, then it clicked in my head– Glenn said so, too! They’re trying to keep it a secret, but Glenn was waking people up.”

“A lot of people couldn’t handle what Glenn was saying so they stopped watching him, but it was true. Then Soros put out a contract on Glenn. Glenn knew it and said it. Glenn had such courage!”

“You know, that old show ‘The Twilight Zone’– it predicted a lot of this mess. I miss that show. I wish that guy who hosted it hadn’t smoked himself to death. We could use him today!”

“Obama promised everything to everybody and it’s just deceit. The press protected him, but Glenn Beck told the truth.”

“That Michele Bachmann is amazing. Has her own kids plus 20-some foster kids and she’s in politics– how’s she do it all?!”

“The people advising Obama don’t know what they’re talking about. Herman Cain said he’d pick the right people!”

“No matter who the Republicans put up for president, the dems will dig up dirt on them. That’s what they do.”

“The democrats have made this country a laughingstock.”

“A lot of people in this country have no idea what’s really going on.”

“That’s what I liked about Glenn. He said, ‘Do your own research!’, and I did.”

“George Soros is the puppet master. He wants it left, then pulls it to the center. I’ve watched it over and over again, but now I have insider information. Soros pulls all the strings.”

So it went for a couple hours. I never knew how much I didn’t know.

After three long hours of sitting and playing musical chairs to get assigned numbers and batched in dozens, four groups of 12 were ushered into a courtroom where we faced the judge, an assistant district attorney, a defendant and his two attorneys plus a court reporter who talked into some contraption. The judge was a Georgian with a heavy accent and a propensity to mumble. I didn’t hear much of what he said. Maybe that neighborhood dog did.

The gist of our case involved marijuana. We were asked a series of questions from the prosecutor and defense attorney:
“Have you ever smoked marijuana?”
“Do you think it should be legalized?”
“If you do think it should be legalized, could you follow the judge’s instructions to obey Georgia law that says no amount of marijuana is legal– could you prosecute by the letter of the law?”
“Do you know or are you related to any law enforcement officers?”
“Do you believe that Rod Serling and Glenn Beck are angels of truth and that George Soros and Barack Obama are devils of destruction?”

O.K., I made that last question up. Sorry.

Sign outside the courtroom. I wonder what the long umbrella incident was. Anyone have any guesses?
This round of questioning with all 48 potential jurors went on for a good 20 minutes. The first batch of 12 were asked to stay for further questioning while the rest of us got a lunch break.

I believe Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall famously said, “One cannot be judgmental on an empty stomach. Hey, uh, you going to eat the rest of that sandwich, or what?”

After lunch, we reassembled in the big room we’d lived in all morning, then my group of 12 was ushered back to court and into the official juror’s box. Comfy chair, padded with good leaning action. A juror could fall in love here.

Each of us was asked questions by attorneys and the judge. When it came my turn, they confirmed that I had responded marijuana should be legalized. They explained that under Georgia law, any amount of marijuana is considered illegal. Could I follow the judge’s instruction and prosecute on the basis of the law? Good question. I told the truth that while I’d like to believe I could follow the letter of the law, I felt that too much energy, time and money was wasted on these type of cases. There are more important things we should be focused on instead of pot violations. This perspective would naturally have to influence my ability to prosecute to the full extent of the law. There were nods given by questioners, and notes taken.

After a half hour of questioning, we 12 were taken back to the big room to wait another hour while two more batches of potential jurors went through hot box grilling.

Finally, seven hours after my arrival, the 48 potential jurors were brought back to the courtroom and 12 were selected as OFFICIAL jurors to serve on this post trial. I was not selected. Jurors #47 and #48 didn’t make the grade, either.

Perhaps George Soros had them black-balled.

We were dismissed and I left the courtroom. In front of me, Juror #47 found a new friend to tell her political secrets to.

Now, every night this week, I must call in to see if I am required to show up for another round on “Who gets to be a juror?!”

Today, I’m free, but I know so much more than I did yesterday. Justice was served.

4 thoughts on “Serving Time on Jury Duty”

  1. I know that a man-about-town like you knows every detail about the infamous Georgia umbrella incident. I’ll bet a ten ten-cent Soros dollars you do.

  2. Actually, I haven’t a clue, but it does make me want to begin carrying a long umbrella any time I am in a dangerous setting.

    Perhaps it is to pop open and begin a dance number.

  3. I don’t know a single thing about the infamous Georgia umbrella incident you mention, Ms. Kitty.

    But if Georgia’s courts are anything like the Third Circuit Court in Detroit, it’s likely they prohibit the following items, a list that includes, you’ll note, stick or cane-style umbrellas:

    Alcoholic beverages
    Ammunition
    Aerosols or any spray device
    Batteries
    Bingo markers
    Box cutters
    Brass knuckles
    Bug spray
    Bullets (anything resembling or similar)
    Cameras/Recording Devices
    Can openers of any kind, including P38’s
    Cans – aluminum and metal
    Camera phones (excluding those for attorneys)
    Cell phones (effective 09-01-05, excluding those for attorneys)
    Chains
    Cigarette lighters/matches
    Combs – metal or rattail
    Cord-like objects, including ropes, chains, straps, heavy belts, and wires
    Curling irons
    Darts
    Dental floss
    Drug paraphernalia
    Explosive materials or objects
    Flatware, including knives, forks or spoons
    Glass or mirrors of any kind, including glass bottles of any kind
    Guns or replicas of guns
    Grease pencils
    Hair clippers
    Hair spray
    Handcuffs
    Headphones (with cords)
    Heavy metal objects
    Highlighters or markers (except for use by attorneys)
    Illegal drugs
    Knives (any kind)
    Laptop computers
    Large bags of any kind, including duffle bags, backpacks and oversized purses
    Large perfume bottles
    Mace, pepper spray
    Master Locks
    Nail clippers/metal nail files
    Needles of any kind, except with medical documentation
    Noisemakers of any kind
    Paints of any kind
    Pagers
    Palm Pilots and other PDAs (except for use by attorneys)
    Pencil sharpener
    Radios (or headsets)
    Razors or razor blades
    Safety pins
    Scissors
    Screwdrivers
    Spikes
    Staplers or staple removers
    Stick or cane style umbrellas
    Tools of any sort, including hammers, saws, measuring tape, etc.
    Tweezers
    Video games, giga pets, gameboys, etc.
    Weapon-like objects, including bats, clubs, batons and irons
    Weapons, including toys or replicas (excluding those carried by law enforcement officials)
    Whistles

    PLEASE NOTE: Other items deemed dangerous by Third Circuit Court security personnel will also be prohibited. All surrendered items will be confiscated and not returned.

    •••

    It’s perfectly understandable why many of the prohibited items would be there. No one with an iota of common sense, after all, would want to see the items used in a way that could endanger courtroom personnel. But why can’t the items be returned as their owners leave the courtroom? Moreover, what happens to the items that have been confiscated but not returned?

    In a way, it’s a situation not unlike traveling by air these days.

    Let’s say you go through security at an airport and a TSA security official finds a can of shaving cream or a tube of toothpaste in your suitcase that’s too large. The items are confiscated by TSA, and you’re free to pass through the security checkpoint to your departure gate.

    You hope you’ll be able to buy shaving cream or toothpaste at your destination, most likely a hotel. You hope, too, that you’ll be able to buy the items for a reasonable price. That’s a traveler’s dream, of course, inasmuch as buying any and all items sold in hotel lobby gift shops, including shaving cream or toothpaste, is as costly as buying the overpriced treats in a hotel room guest bar. The treats you can’t resist when it’s late at night, and you’re naked or close to it, and you’re suddenly overcome by hunger or thirst.

    Extending my digression about confiscated items even further, especially the ones seized by TSA security officials at airports, what happens to the items? Are they sent to homeless shelters? To Third World nations? To a local landfill?

    As usual, by the way, The Lint Screen’s report on an important part of what makes America so great was completely lucid. Law schools in all corners of the land should read it.

    It should probably be sent to Justice Clarence Thomas, too, if only to remind him that fair and successful jurisprudence in America requires active participation by all, including him. Over the past five years, according to a recent report in Time magazine, he hasn’t asked a single question during oral arguments presented in cases before the Supreme Court. Five years! You’d think something would have occurred to him. Something like, oh, I don’t know, something on the order of “Could I take a closer look at that Coca-Cola can?”

  4. Curvin, I think I know what happens to booty confiscated by the TSA– they are used by the TSA. Notice the smoothly-shaved skin, minty breath, pearly white teeth– they do not come from walking beneath harsh lighting and by strong X-ray machines.

    As for Justice Thomas, perhaps the cat really does have his tongue. Or, if he can’t talk nasty he won’t talk at all.

Leave a Comment